Enhanced Real-Time Unit Commitment Engagement

Documents referenced on this page, but not posted, can be obtained by contacting engagement@ieso.ca with a link to the web page that lists the document and advise whether it needs to be provided in an accessible format. Please allow a minimum of one business day for a response.

Update August 21, 2019: The Enhanced Real-Time Unit Commitment high-level design engagement has completed. Please visit the energy detailed design engagement to learn about current engagement opportunities.

The IESO is working with stakeholders to design and develop an Enhanced Real-Time Unit Commitment (ERUC) program. An Enhanced Real-Time Unit Commitment Program will improve the efficiency of unit commitments in the intra-day timeframe by taking into account all resource costs in commitment decisions. An ERUC will also improve commitment decisions overall by optimizing over multiple hours rather than solving for each hour independently.

Background

The Real-Time Generator Cost Guarantee (RT-GCG) program ensures that generators with long start-up times are available to meet reliability, if needed, in real-time. It has evolved over the years in terms of its eligibility criteria and the cost recovery framework and methodology.  However, there remain a number of systemic issues with the design of the current program.

  • Inefficiency: Resources under the program are committed solely on the basis of their energy offers; start-up, speed no load and other costs are not included in this calculation and are recovered under the pre-approved cost recovery framework. 
  • Lack of Competition: The lack of consideration of start-up costs means generators in the program do not have to compete on those costs to get a commitment.
  • Misalignment with Day-Ahead: The day-ahead and intra-day commitment programs use different optimization both in terms of the inputs considered and the optimization timeframe (day-ahead commitments are based on three-part offers and 24 hour optimization where RT-GCG commitments are based on energy offers only and each hour is optimized independently). 
  • Administration and Oversight: Historically, cost submissions have been subject to review and audit creating a high administrative burden for both the IESO and market participants. 

The design of the RT-GCG program has also been criticized in several Market Surveillance Panel reports due to its inefficiency, cost and lack of transparency.

Under Market Renewal the current commitment program will be enhanced to one that facilitates greater competition and more efficiently commits resources anticipated to be needed for reliability in real-time.  This will be achieved by:

  • Allowing participants to competitively submit offers reflecting incremental energy, start-up and speed-no-load costs respectively
  • Including all costs associated with offers in the IESO’s optimization tools
  • Making commitment decisions based on the total efficiency of all hours across the commitment period

Enhanced Real-Time Unit Commitment, together with a Day-Ahead Market and a Single Schedule Market collectively will improve the dispatch, commitment and pricing of resources in the energy market.

Get involved

This initiative will re-envision how stakeholders participate and are committed in the intra-day timeframe and will therefore be of interest to all IESO market participants.

Interested parties are invited to participate in, and provide feedback on, any of the Market Renewal initiatives.

For more information about how to become involved or to provide comments on this initiative, please contact engagement@ieso.ca.

Enhanced Real-Time Unit Commitment High-Level Design (final full document August 2019)

Executive Summary (final August 2019)

Revisions to the Energy Stream High-Level Design Documents (August 2019)

Enhanced Real-Time Unit Commitment High-Level Design (draft full document December 2018)

Executive Summary (draft December 2018)

Backgrounder

ERUC Design Tracker
Issues & Actions Log

Schedule of Activities

          

Date
Agenda

Activities

Expected Actions

August 8, 2019

 

  • IESO Response to Stakeholder Feedback – Enhanced Real-Time Unit Commitment 
  • IESO Response to Stakeholder Feedback – General themes on the energy stream
 

February 28, 2019

Stakeholder Feedback

  • AMPCO
  • APPrO
  • Capital Power
  • EDA
  • Goreway Power Station
  • Northland Power
  • Ontario Power Generation
  • Ontario Energy Association
  • TransAlta
 

February 7, 2019

 Q&A Session

  • Communication
 

December 20, 2018

Release of draft ERUC High-Level Design


December 15, 2018

 Stakeholder Feedback

  • Ontario Power Generation
  • Ontario Waterpower Association
 

November 22, 2018

 Deadline for feedback on SSM HLD

  • Communication
 

October 18, 2018

 

Market Renewal Education and Awareness Sessions for targeted audiences

 

October 18, 2018

Stakeholder feedback on materials and issues discussed at the September 20th meeting

  • AMPCO
  • Market Surveillance Panel
  • Ontario Power Generation
  • IESO Response to Stakeholder Feedback
 

September 20, 2018

Agenda

Minutes

 Stakeholder Meeting                            

  • Communication
  • Presentation
  • Congestion Rents and Loss Residual Zonal Disbursement Methodology
  • Intertie Congestion Pricing
  • Review of Market Power Mitigation Decisions and Guidelines
  • Introduction to the High Level Design Review Process
  • Day Ahead Market
  • Detailed Design Phase 

August 16, 2018

 

Stakeholder Feedback on materials and issues discussed at the July 18th and 19th meetings

  • Nalcor Energy
  • Ontario Power Generation
  • Workbench

IESO Response to Stakeholder Feedback

 

July 18-19, 2018

Agenda

Minutes

Stakeholder Meeting

  • Communication
  • Presentation
  • Market Power Mitigation Design Considerations
  • Optimization of Energy Limited Resources
  • Combined Cycle Plant Modelling
  • Settlement Topics
 

June 21, 2018

Stakeholder feedback on materials and issues discussed at the May 23rd and 24th meetings

  • ADG Group
  • AMPCO
  • APPrO – ERUC
  • APPrO – MPM
  • Consortium of Renewable Generators and Storage Providers
  • DER AC
  • HQ Energy Marketing
  • MAG Energy - DAM
  • MAG Energy – ERUC
  • MAG Energy - SSM
  • Ontario Power Generation 

IESO Response to Stakeholder Feedback

 

June 7, 2018

Webinar Invitation: MRP Energy Workstream - Intertie Transactions - Stakeholder Discussion

  • Communication

Stakeholder Feedback

  • HQ Energy Marketing
  • MAG Energy
  • Ontario Power Generation
 

May 23-24, 2018

Agenda

Minutes

Stakeholder Meeting

  • Intertie Transactions
  • Presentation
  • Market Power Mitigation Design Considerations
  • Two Settlement and Make-Whole Design Scenarios
          

April 27, 2018

Stakeholder feedback on materials and issues discussed at March 29 meeting

  • APPrO
  • APPrO (received May 11, 2018)
  • Capital Power
  • MAG Energy Solutions
  • Ontario Power Generation

IESO Response to Stakeholder Feedback

 

March 29, 2018

ERUC Minutes

MPMI Minutes

Stakeholder Meeting

  • Presentation
  • Market Power Mitigation Design Considerations
                       

February 15, 2018

Stakeholder Feedback

  • APPrO
  • Emera Energy
  • Ontario Power Generation
  • Nalcor Energy
  • Northland Power
  • TransAlta
  • Workbench Corp.

IESO Response to Stakeholder Feedback

 

January 31, 2018

Agenda

Minutes

Stakeholder Meeting

  • Presentation

December 7, 2017

Stakeholder Feedback

  • Powerful Solutions

IESO Response to Stakeholder Feedback

 

November 27, 2017

Agenda

Stakeholder Meeting – Design Elements Fundamentals

  • Presentation

Materials posted one week in advance of meeting

Recorded Presentation

October 30, 2017

Agenda

Stakeholder Meeting – Design Elements Fundamentals

  • Design Element Fundamentals 1

Recorded Presentation

October 11, 2017

Agenda

Stakeholder Meeting - Introduction to Engagement, High Level Overview of Design Elements and Scope

  • Introduction to Enhanced Real-time Unit Commitment (ERUC)
  • ERUC: Overview and Design Elements

Recorded Presentation

September 28, 2017

Announce Engagement and Post Draft Stakeholder Engagement Plan